🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an celebration that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are compensated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The period has developed since those days, focusing less on the histories of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and more on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how important it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to remove the history of people of color and narrative from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the month illustrates how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Establishments who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that impact society if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is in order – Black History is Now Month.